Top Hezbollah spokesman killed; Israeli attack kills 70 in north Gaza, official says – msn/WaPost
Washington Post reporters continue to describe the US-sponsored genocide in Gaza while its editors ignore, downplay, or bury supporting details. In the hard copy of Monday’s paper, for example, mention of the 70 people killed (and many buried) in an airstrike on civilians was first mentioned in paragraph 20 of a story on page A13. The hard copy story led with information on an Israeli airstrike in Beirut and discussion of Israel’s difficulty in recruiting for its armed forces. Are Post editors showing their pro-Israel bias or leery of offending pro-Zionist Washington elites still receiving the paper at home? Can factual reporting be downplayed to the same degree for the online audience?
Here are reports of the same bombing of Gazans incapable of fighting back from other publications:
At least 70 killed in Israeli strike on Gaza’s Beit Lahia – msn/The National
Nearly 70% of Gaza war dead are women and children, UN says – BBC